About writing. And reading. And being published. Or not published. On working on being published. Tangents into the pop culture world to come. Especially about movies. And comic books. And movies from comic books.
Friday, June 24, 2016
A Fire Upon the Deep (a book review post)
It's not that I hated the book, but it never achieved likability. It was like one of those foods you're willing to eat to be polite but, really, you'd just rather not. Like asparagus.
The first issue was the characters. Not that they were the first issue, exactly, but you can forgive a lot of stupid stuff in books (or on TV or whatever) if the characters are good. Good meaning that you can relate to them in some way and empathize with their situation. Or negatively empathize (as with an antagonist). But this book had zero characters with whom I could connect, so I never came to care about what happened to any of them. The only character I came even close to liking got killed not long after he was introduced.
And it was difficult to actually dislike the "villain," since it amounted to no more than a program.
So not only did I not have anyone to root for, I also didn't have anyone to root against, so there was nothing really compelling within the story to keep me wanting to read it.
Some would say the book is about the world building, which is extensive, but I didn't find that appealing, either. There were too many things that I found, well, just dumb. Like the galaxy having "zones." Not zones like you'd have on a map, but zones like the layers of a rain forest: floor, understory, canopy, emergent. The problem with these zones in the book (unthinking depths, slow, beyond, transcend) is that they were represented somewhat like evolutionary stages. Earth is in the slow zone but, once man had evolved enough, he moved up to the beyond, except it's the technology that's evolving, not man.
The problem with all of that is that the technology cannot actually physically exist (work) in an incorrect zone. Imagine it like this: You grow up in a kind of rundown neighborhood and all you have is a bike, but you work hard and save and, eventually, move to a better neighborhood and buy a house and a car. Let's say that one day you want to visit your old home, so you decide to drive by and see it just for the sake of nostalgia. The only problem is that when your car enters the old neighborhood, it quits working. It just shuts off. You could still put it in neutral and push it around the streets, but that would take a very long time and be a lot of hard work. Or you could build a bicycle mechanism into your car that you could switch to when your engine cut off.
I don't find this kind of thing fascinating to ponder, not in any way. It's a ridiculous approach to physics and the universe.
And not to spoil the ending, and I'm not actually going to tell you what happens, but you shouldn't read the next bit if you want to remain in the unawares:
It has a totally deus ex machina ending. That's not a problem in-and-of itself, because you know from the beginning, basically, that that's what they're looking for. However, when it happens, it goes all in and offers absolutely no explanation. The ending just happens. They show up and everything that is going to happen happens without them doing anything other than being there. And that, also, doesn't quite make sense, but there is no explanation offered. It was unsatisfying, to say the least.
And that was after the six-month slog to read it.
Probably, I will go ahead and read the next one, A Deepness in the Sky, but that's because I already have it. If I didn't, I wouldn't bother. And when I say I'm going to read it, I only mean that I'm going to start it. If it's not better, I'm not going to force myself through it like I did this one.
Note: This is one of the author's I decided to explore several years ago when I was doing the fiction to science thing for a-to-z. Vernor Vinge came up with the idea of the technological singularity, and these books deal with that. So, yeah, sometimes I read a book I'm not enjoying so that I can understand the impact of it (like Snow Crash, which was horrible, but, after reading it, I understand why people became so enthralled with it (hint: It wasn't the writing)). Trust me, it's not some weird sadomasochistic reading urge. I just want to understand the cultural significance of the thing.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
You're a better reader than I am, Andrew. I don't think I'd be moving on to the next one like you're doing.ReplyDelete
Elsie: If I didn't already have it, I wouldn't, but I really did expect to like these books, so I bought the first two.Delete
From your review I wouldn't have kept going. Some of these concepts are quite interesting, frightening in some cases as there could be some realism in the ideas, I can only admire your commitment to finishing the book.ReplyDelete
Sally: I thought that, too, before I read it.Delete
Hugo winning doesn't equate to a good book.ReplyDelete
And I know it can't be good if you say you won't slog through the second book if it's not better.
Alex: Let's just hope it is.Delete
Wow, six months? That is a slog. The second book will have to be pretty damn good then. From your description, it's not as "heart-pounding" as Publisher's Weekly claims.ReplyDelete
Jeanne: I'm not sure my heart pounded at all. It was more like a coma.Delete
I firmly believe you are one of the most dedicated readers I've ever followed. You know my attention is way too fickle for a six-day slog let alone six months! Ugh. Sorry your perseverance wasn't better rewarded!ReplyDelete
Veronica: It happens. The book I'm reading right now is awesome! and totally makes up for it.Delete
Too bad this one didn't work. As ever, I find it interesting that you're still up for the next one in the series.ReplyDelete
I actually like asparagus. Eggplant, though...
TAS: My wife likes asparagus. I have tried it, but...Delete
Beets. I really can't stand beets.Delete
I actually kind of like the idea about the galaxies/zones; it sounds sort of intriguing, like steampunk. But if the story around it isn't worth it, then count me out.ReplyDelete
Briane: You have to weigh me against Rusty; this is one of his favorite books.Delete
Based on your review I'll probably avoid this one. I'm curious to know how you like the 2nd book though!ReplyDelete
Trisha: Hopefully, it won't take six months for you to find out.Delete