Friday, March 31, 2017

Beauty and the Beast (a movie review post)

What I want to do here is to talk about Disney's scheme of remaking their animated hits as live action movies, because, other than Maleficent, it seems rather pointless. However, when the goal is to make money, they are quite nicely fulfilling their point. Beauty and the Beast has already made over $200 million, and it hasn't, at the time of this writing, even been out a week. However, that discussion has nothing to do with the actual movie and should probably be saved for some other time. Or not had at all. Well, I'm sure plenty of other people are having it, so, probably, I will skip it other than to say that I liked the idea of re-telling the stories, as in Maleficent, from some other point of view.

Of course, the problem with talking about this movie, at least for me, is that it's very difficult to do as a thing all on its own without any kind of comparison or consideration of the 1991 animated feature. Probably, that's impossible. Disney's original Beauty was a landmark film and, really, changed animation forever. It was the first animated movie to be nominated for Best Picture at the Academy awards and was the cause of the best animated feature category being created. This movie, the remake, despite beautiful animation, can't be said to be anything more than conventional. In fact, my daughter's response to it (and she's the one who wanted to see it) was, "It was all right."

I think I liked it more than she did. But she hasn't seen the original in so long she barely remembers it, and it was never anything to her more than another movie on video. In post-Pixar days, it's difficult for earlier animated movies to hold up. Maybe that's why they need to be remade...

But part of what I liked about it had to do with nostalgia more than any inherent quality in the movie itself. Which is not to say that it's not a good movie. It is. It's a good movie, possibly very good, with some great performances and great music, which goes without saying since much of the music is from the original.

Also, as you could expect from a Disney movie, the cast is great. Emma Watson is charming. Kevin Kline is... well, he's Kevin Kline, so he was great. Dan Stevens looks princely, which, especially for Disney, is appropriate. Luke Evans is incredible and came close to stealing the whole movie. Not quite but close. Ewan McGregor and Ian McKellen are an amazing voice pair. They, also, came close to stealing the show.

Really, though, what it comes down to is this:
If you're a fan of the original because you remember seeing it in the theater when it was first released, you will probably get a big shot of nostalgia from this movie and love it. I'm going to guess that children will really enjoy it, too, but I don't know if it is the kind of movie that will actually compete with animated movies for their attention. For people in between, well, it's probably not going to be anything special. It's good, but it's not going to blow you away or change your life. It's probably worth seeing on the big screen, though.

6 comments:

  1. I suppose it's not a coincidence that it's coming out now, as people my age who saw it when it came out now have children who can go see the remake. Personally, I think the original held up to the test of time better than this one will.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jeanne: Actually, I think it kind of is. I mean, with this movie, it is. It's just part of their process which started with Sleeping Beauty and Cinderella.

      Delete
  2. I went with my grown-up daughter to see it. We enjoyed it and being together. The thing I remember most about the original is how my 6 year old son was terrified by the scene where the wolves attacked the Beast.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Susan: I suppose I most remember the ballroom scene, since going to see that is what drove me to the theater to begin with. If you can call it that, since I was sort of dragged.

      Delete
  3. I was disappointed, though not exactly surprised by the amount of auto-tuning employed. I understand casting Emma Watson as she's a big name but you know there is an army of talented actresses out there who could have knocked those songs out of the park without any tech help. I guess auto-tune is the 21st century's Marni Nixon (RIP, one of 2016's under appreciated losses).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TAS: See, people like me can't tell that kind of stuff, sort of like when other people go to see the X-Men movies and I get tweaked out by them.

      Delete