One of the hallmarks of the ridiculously stupid and the inanely ignorant is that they will toss around words and phrases without actually knowing what they mean. Of course, they think they're using the words or phrases correctly and, sometimes, the people around them do, too, because they're under a kind of mass delusion of meaning. My favorites, right now, all have to do with the Constitution, and my very favorite are the Conservative jutnobs who keep yelling about their "freedom of speech."
So let's talk a little about "freedom of speech" and the 1st Amendment and what it means and does in regard to that freedom. But just a little, because it's a big topic with lots of small parts that we could talk about for... well, for far longer than I would hold your attention, I'm sure.
The first thing you need to understand is that the "freedom of speech" being granted by the 1st Amendment is a protection being granted to the individual. A protection from the government. See, in many countries, criticizing the government or a religion can get you thrown in jail. Or worse. Having just emerged from the tyranny of a government that had no problem punishing people for things they said, the founding fathers wanted to protect people from thin-skinned assholes who would abuse their power by throwing people into jail for saying bad things about them or just for disagreeing with them in general.
Here's the thing: "Freedom of Speech" does not mean you have the right to say whatever old thing you want to say. That was never the intent, and we have many laws dealing with the kinds of things that are not protected. Of course, the popular one is about how it is illegal to stand up in a crowded theater and yell, "Fire!" Then there's yelling "bomb!" in an airport. Your "freedom of speech" argument isn't going to get you very far in either case.
What the 1st Amendment does allow is that you can go out on any street corner and protest against the government or a religion or, actually, be as racist as you want, and you can't be arrested for it. Well, as long as you're not promoting violence. Because, see, the promotion of violence is not protected.
The problem with all of this is the misconceptions.
First, your right to say whatever it is you want to say does not in any way obligate me to listen to you. Also, it does not in any way validate whatever it is you're saying, meaning your right to an opinion does not make your opinion correct. People (mostly on the Right (though those anti-vaxxers from both sides are pretty bad, too)) seem to be under the misperception that they are having their "freedom of speech" violated if I don't want to listen to them, which is just another asinine assumption those people like to make. Further, if I tell them they are wrong (and from me, generally, that means their opinions are based on no facts whatsoever) and that I am no longer going to engage with them on the (or any) subject, they tend to froth at the mouth and tell me I'm violating their "freedom of speech."
But let's go back to that street corner I mentioned earlier. See, the 1st Amendment does indeed give you the right to stand on that street corner and pontificate as much as you want about "illegals" and "swinging dicks" and your right to own as many guns as you want (which is a topic for another time), but I don't have to stop and listen, nor does anyone else. We are all free to walk right on past you and leave you shouting at the air. Not to mention the fact that that same 1st Amendment right gives me the right to pause and tell you what an asshole you are and how all the things you're saying just prove how ignorant and uneducated you are. You use your freedom of speech the way you want; I'll use mine the way I want, up to and including letting you know just how big of an ignorant asshole you really are.
Second, the 1st Amendment does not give you the right to exercise your word vomit anywhere you want to. Which takes us back to the street corner. The public street corner. Because that's what's protected, public spaces. I'm not going to get into the nuance of how that applies to businesses because that can be very different depending on the type of business, but your freedom of speech does not extend to other people's private property. That means that if you are in my house and you start saying things I don't like, I can tell you to stop and you're pretty much obligated to do so. You are not protected by the 1st Amendment. You either stop or you leave.
And just to make the point: That extends to my blog and to my facebook page. For all intents and purposes, those are "my" spaces. What that means is that if you post something on my FB wall or make a comment on my blog and I don't, for lack of a better term, approve of it, I can remove it, and I have not violated your "freedom of speech." In fact, when you start telling me that I have, that, again, just shows how ignorant and uneducated you are. And, certainly, you should not start citing something that you actually have no clue about, because it proves you're talking out of your ass, and no one wants to see that. If you feel the desperate need to say the things you are trying to say in my space, please feel free to go to your own space and say them all you want. That's what your "freedom of speech" gets for you.
[Just to be clear: "My" space on this blog or on facebook is not actually my space. It is only my space insomuch as google and facebook have allowed me to use them. They own the spaces and could at any time decide that they don't like the things I've said and take them down. That goes for pretty much everyone using those spaces. But, still, as google and FB have granted me the privilege of using their spaces, it is an extension of me, and your "freedom of speech" does not extend into it.]
Not to go all Princess Bride here, but, when you start spouting off at the ass about your "freedom of speech" any time I say I'm not going to discuss a topic with you until you actually get educated about the subject, I want to say, "You keep saying that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." Which is to say, "I know that it doesn't mean what you think it means." Which is to say, "Here's another thing you should really go educate yourself on before you start making statements about it."
Not that education is going to remain something that is accessible to the "common man" if Trump and cohorts get their way.
About writing. And reading. And being published. Or not published. On working on being published. Tangents into the pop culture world to come. Especially about movies. And comic books. And movies from comic books.
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Monday, March 13, 2017
Monday, February 13, 2017
Day Three
Monday, January
22, 2018
I got up for school and the internet was still not
working.
Except that it was and, now, I know why everyone kept
saying the internet itself was fine because now the internet is gone. Trump
took it away. I thought I hated Trump before, but I really hate him now.
When I got up, I turned on my laptop to check. I
figured it had to come back sometime and, really, I’ve been checking all the
time all weekend so, of course, I checked. My google homepage said this:
Give
me your tired, your poor,
your
huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
the
wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send
these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I
lift my lamp beside the golden door.
This message brought to you by the free states of
California, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire,
Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and New Jersey
Even New Jersey.
I wondered who wrote it. It’s really pretty. I want to
go to California. Even Washington.
Anyway, that’s what the internet said. Everywhere I
checked, netflix, facebook, youtube, everywhere. That was on every page.
Obviously, the internet was working even if that’s all that was there.
Then I had to go to school.
School was weird. The teachers tried to act like
everything was normal, but there kept being questions about China. And about
the poem on the internet. That’s where I found out that it was from the Statue
of Liberty. I hadn’t known the statue said anything. I wanted to know why. Why
did it say that, but I hate raising my hand to ask questions.
But Olivia’s hand shot right up – she ALWAYS asks
questions, everyone hates her for it, which is why I hate asking questions – and
she asked it, but the teacher wouldn’t answer. She just said we were in English
class, not history, and we weren’t going to talk about that. So I thought it
was a poem and we could talk about it because it was a poem, and I almost
raised my hand because I really wanted to know, but Emma raised her hand and
asked almost the same question and about who wrote it, but Mrs.
Stick-up-her-butt still said no.
And that’s how it was all day. No one would answer the
real questions we had. Like about the Statue of Liberty and about why
California and Washington and New York would put something on the internet that
said that and about whether we were in a war with China. Other than the trade
war that everyone had been talking about for months and blaming China for why
everything was costing so much.
After lunch, Trump came on TV. It was a live broadcast.
He wanted everyone everywhere to watch it which made me wonder if my parents
were being able to watch it, because the TV at home wouldn’t work because we
didn’t have an antenna, and there were no TVs where my dad worked. But they
heard it because it was on the radio, too.
And Trump said he turned off the internet.
He said we had to be protected from those rebellious
states and thoughts and he couldn’t have them putting stuff like that on the
internet because only he knew what was good for the United States and he wasn’t
going to have that kind of stuff out there for people to see.
He said he would make a new internet and it would be
beautiful. Then he talked about twitter. A lot. And he was mad that some people
would ruin everything for everyone because they wouldn’t do what they were
told. And that he was going to make a big, new, beautiful internet.
But, until then, we would all have to use our TVs so
everyone should go buy antennas and he was going to make sure that there were
plenty of TV antennas for everyone and it was going to make so many jobs.
So I was mad that my parents voted for Trump because
he said awful things and did awful things, but my parents said I just didn’t
understand but that I would when I got older and that he would be better as a
president and I should just wait and see. But he hasn’t been better as a
president; he’s been worse, and even they complain about the things he says and
does all the time now.
AND NOW HE TURNED OFF THE INTERNET AND I HATE HIM!!!
Because when I got home, I found that instead of the
blank screens I had been getting, I was getting that screen you get when the
internet is down. The one with the little dinosaur that let’s you play that
stupid game. And now there is no reason to check for the internet anymore,
because I know that it’s gone.
At least until we get the internet that Trump says he’s
going to build, but I expect that that is going to go about the same as the
wall that he still is talking about but isn’t happening, either.
Dad spent all evening out trying to get an antenna for
our TV, but no one has any. He said he might be able to make something out of a
clothes hanger, and Mom spent an hour looking for one, including ransacking my
closet. I told her I didn’t have any wires ones and that I would look, but she
wouldn’t let me or even listen to me and shoved my stuff all around. It was
rude, and, like I said, I didn’t have one. She couldn’t find one in the whole
house, so we still don’t have any TV, either.
I feel depressed and don’t know what to do. There’s
nothing to do. Except, I guess, read. Is that what people used to do before
there was TV and the internet? I can’t even listen to music because Mom has the
stupid news on the radio ALL the time, but all they do is say the same things
over and over again without ever actually saying anything. THEY can’t even answer
the question about whether we are in a war with China. Or what it means that
that poem was in the internet and why those states said that.
Tomorrow, I guess, I need to go buy some books. Or go
to the library. All I can find here are mom’s stupid romance things, and that’s
not what I want to read about.
I want to go to California. I bet they have the
internet.
Labels:
books,
California,
China,
day three,
facebook,
Google,
Internet,
January 22,
library,
Netflix,
Nevada,
New York,
Oregon,
reading,
school,
Statue of Liberty,
Trump,
TV,
twitter,
Washington
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
The A to Z of Fiction to Reality: Driverless Cars
Cars able to drive themselves have been so pervasive in fiction that I'm not even going to try to figure out where the idea originated. It's like as soon as there was the idea of a car, there was also the idea of it driving itself. So, instead of exploring the origin of the idea, we're going to talk about some of my favorite examples.
First up is the movie Minority Report. Everything about transportation in this movie is interesting. The way the roads are built, everything. The cars, of course, are autonomous. You get in, set your destination, and do whatever you want to do while you get there. That's the kind of travel I want. Just think about all that extra time to read!
Probably the most famous car that could drive itself was KITT from the 1982 TV show Knight Rider. Of course, during the show, most of the driving was done by Michael Knight (played by David Hasselhoff), but KITT could drive itself if it needed to. And talk. And, even, because it had a laser, pop popcorn (no, this was never shown in the TV show, but I'm sure it was possible). I'm pretty sure there wasn't kid growing up in the 80s that didn't want a car like KITT. I mean, on top of everything else, it was a Trans Am, and it just looked cool.
But the car of my childhood, the bast car of all, was Speed Buggy. Speed Buggy was awesome. Not only could Speed Buggy drive itself, and talk, and had eyes, but it could do things like super inflate its tires so that it could drive on water. All in all, Speed Buggy was way cooler than Herbie. Herbie couldn't even talk. Well, okay, Herbie was brave (Speed Buggy was a scaredy cat), but he was also an annoying romantic and called The Love Bug. What boy wants to drive around in a car called The Love Bug? Speed Buggy wins.
Well, looking at my list and thinking back over some other cars that could drive themselves, it seems that a lot of these also had their own form of AI, which we already covered. Of course, the ability to have a car that can drive itself would imply, I suppose, some sort of AI to guide it. Probably, we'd rather driverless cars a la Minority Report than any of the other.
But are these real? Right now? Just last year, Nevada was the first state to pass a law making driverless cars road legal. Google, yes that Google, has been road testing them for years and has hundreds of thousands of miles of driving time. With no accidents. Okay, well, one accident, but the car was actually being driven by a human at the time and was also rear-ended, so no fault of the car.
Are you ready for your Google car? I want to say I am, but I had this thought the other day... see, when I think of a car that can drive itself, I think of being able to read or sleep while the car does the work. However, I'm sure that that's not what most people would be doing. No, most people will be watching movies or being online or whatever. And, then, I realized! See, it's always seemed sort of weird that Google would be working on car that drives itself, but it all makes sense now! What did I say most people will be doing while the car drives around? Watching stuff. All powered by Google. Think of all the extra advertising time Google will get out of this. Not to mention all the new advertising powered GPS and stuff...
Makes you think, doesn't it?
First up is the movie Minority Report. Everything about transportation in this movie is interesting. The way the roads are built, everything. The cars, of course, are autonomous. You get in, set your destination, and do whatever you want to do while you get there. That's the kind of travel I want. Just think about all that extra time to read!
Probably the most famous car that could drive itself was KITT from the 1982 TV show Knight Rider. Of course, during the show, most of the driving was done by Michael Knight (played by David Hasselhoff), but KITT could drive itself if it needed to. And talk. And, even, because it had a laser, pop popcorn (no, this was never shown in the TV show, but I'm sure it was possible). I'm pretty sure there wasn't kid growing up in the 80s that didn't want a car like KITT. I mean, on top of everything else, it was a Trans Am, and it just looked cool.
But the car of my childhood, the bast car of all, was Speed Buggy. Speed Buggy was awesome. Not only could Speed Buggy drive itself, and talk, and had eyes, but it could do things like super inflate its tires so that it could drive on water. All in all, Speed Buggy was way cooler than Herbie. Herbie couldn't even talk. Well, okay, Herbie was brave (Speed Buggy was a scaredy cat), but he was also an annoying romantic and called The Love Bug. What boy wants to drive around in a car called The Love Bug? Speed Buggy wins.
Well, looking at my list and thinking back over some other cars that could drive themselves, it seems that a lot of these also had their own form of AI, which we already covered. Of course, the ability to have a car that can drive itself would imply, I suppose, some sort of AI to guide it. Probably, we'd rather driverless cars a la Minority Report than any of the other.
But are these real? Right now? Just last year, Nevada was the first state to pass a law making driverless cars road legal. Google, yes that Google, has been road testing them for years and has hundreds of thousands of miles of driving time. With no accidents. Okay, well, one accident, but the car was actually being driven by a human at the time and was also rear-ended, so no fault of the car.
Are you ready for your Google car? I want to say I am, but I had this thought the other day... see, when I think of a car that can drive itself, I think of being able to read or sleep while the car does the work. However, I'm sure that that's not what most people would be doing. No, most people will be watching movies or being online or whatever. And, then, I realized! See, it's always seemed sort of weird that Google would be working on car that drives itself, but it all makes sense now! What did I say most people will be doing while the car drives around? Watching stuff. All powered by Google. Think of all the extra advertising time Google will get out of this. Not to mention all the new advertising powered GPS and stuff...
Makes you think, doesn't it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


