Friday, July 29, 2016

The Gate To Women's Country (a book review post)

Generally speaking, post-apocalyptic books aren't my thing. Post-apocalyptic stories tend to revolve around one thing: how horrible everything is after the apocalypse. This book is not like that. Refreshingly so.

In fact, I didn't know I was reading something post-apocalyptic at first. Yes, that means I didn't know what the book was about. My wife told me I should read it, and I did, and I did that without reading the back cover blurb or anything. Yeah, I trust my wife that much. Her reading standards are much higher than mine, and mine are already pretty darn high. Basically, if she tells me I'm going to like something, I can believe that that is true.

So, yeah, I started reading it without knowing it was post-apocalyptic, so when I got to the part of the story that revealed it was a future society, not just some alternate or fantasy society, it was really an "oh, wow" moment. And, yes, I do realize I ruined that for any of you who might decide to pick the book up, but, really, how many of you were actually not going to read the back cover? That's what I thought, so get off my case. It's right there on the back, so I'm not spoiling anything!

I'm going to make a comparison, now. Everyone loves Ender's Game because they were caught off guard by the ending. Everyone is always, "Oh, wow! I didn't see that coming!" But not me. Not only did I figure out what was going on before the reveal, I knew what was going on almost as soon as it started happening. I liked the book, but there was nothing surprising about the ending to me, and, what's more, at the time I read it, I didn't know the ending was supposed to be a twist. It just seemed the natural outcome to me. I was surprised to find out that other people were surprised by the ending.

The Gate To Women's Country was more like The Sixth Sense in that regard for me. All of the clues as to what is actually going on in that movie are right there in the movie, but you don't see them for what they are. It makes the movie even more brilliant, because you can go back and watch it again and see how all the pieces are laid out and see how you just missed putting them together because you were too caught up in the story. It's rather like missing the forest for the trees.

There is a thing going on in The Gate To Women's Country that's rather brilliant, but what makes it more brilliant is that Tepper lays it all out in front of you -- she basically tells you what's happening -- but you don't see it. I did manage to work it out before the big reveal in the book, but it was rather late, only a few chapters before the reveal, and a definite "oh my God!" moment.

Considering the secret at the center of the novel, a case could be made that this is a dystopian novel. [When I say that, I mean it in the context of the original definition of the word, not the warped view we have of it currently. So, for your cultural edification: The current popular view of "dystopian" amounts to the same as "anti-utopian" or "the opposite of utopian" (which is anything that is not an actual utopian society (so any society currently on Earth (yes, we are all dystopian))). The actual definition of a dystopian society is a society that looks as if it's utopian but has something wrong or flawed at its core. An example would be the society in Brave New World which looks and acts like a utopia except that the population is largely controlled through the use of drugs.] I suppose that depends upon which side of the morally ambiguous question you fall. It's an interesting question, but not one I can go into without spoiling the entire book. But, trust me, I'd love to go into it.

It's a good book. A very good book. It's well written and will probably keep you wondering what it's actually about for quite a while. In a good way. Because you can probably pick up on it not being about what it appears to be about fairly early on. The characters are really good, too, and many of them are not exactly who they appear to be, too, but also in a good way, in the way of getting to know someone, say, away from work when you have only ever known them as a work acquaintance.

The only warning I would give is that the book has a definite feminist slant and, if you can't go in for that, you should probably skip the book; it will probably make you mad. And that, more than anything, will be quite revelatory. If the book makes you mad, it's probably about you.

13 comments:

  1. If you figured it out a few chapters before the ending, I won't figure it out until the actual reveal..I'm just that slow. Great review.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Elsie: Well, there's no actual need to figure it out in advance.

      Delete
  2. What I love about the twist in 6th Sense: the story is fantastic even without it. The twist is icing on the cake. I feel like same way about Usual Suspects.

    I like your last line a lot: "If the book makes you mad, it's probably about you."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TAS: It is a very interesting story without the twist, but I think it's the twist that really elevates it.

      Delete
    2. Yes, agreed, in both cases. But for both movies, I was sold on the story even before the twist.

      Delete
  3. Feminist, dystopian, post-apocalyptic fiction. That's a good cal for me. Any sex? I'd like a little sex with all this...
    That would put it onto the must-read list.
    Great review!
    V:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Veronica: Yes, there is some sex, but not all of that is what I would call having a positive context.

      Delete
  4. I read this book a few years ago, the title catches the eye of some of us. Plus I've read Tepper before and like her. I wrote about her in this year's A to Z Authors. It was a good book, I liked it very much. Great post and review. Your wife was right.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I put it on my list to maybe read someday. Your description sounded better than the actual Amazon description; had I read the Amazon one first I doubt I'd have listed it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Briane: That's probably the same one from the back of the book, which is not just uninteresting but entirely wrong. It gives an entirely inaccurate picture of what the book is about.

      Delete
  6. Your review has given me a diferent perspective on this genre of reading - not my usual stuff but the book sounds a good read.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sally: Post-apocalyptic stuff? Because don't let me sway on the genre in general. This book is nothing like what's typical of the genre.

      Delete