First, yes, I am still working my way through these; I just haven't read any in a couple of months. The one thing I'm discovering about Lovecraft is that all of his stories are only of a few varieties. Over time, it makes them all blur together. The break was not purposeful; it was because every time I opened the book I found I didn't feel like reading Lovecraft at that moment, knowing exactly what to expect. I don't know if it was having had a break from him or if this was a better story than the average, but I enjoyed this one more than the last few that I read (ones I didn't bother to review individually because of a lack of things to say about them).
"From Beyond" has a slight twist on most of the stories I've read by Lovecraft so far while still having the same basic foundation. It's a story about a man, Crawford Tillinghast, who has developed a way to see the hidden worlds all around us. In this, it is very similar to most other Lovecraft stories but, in execution, it is most like "The Terrible Old Man."
This is not a new thought for me, but it's one I don't believe I've stated before in any of the Lovecraft reviews I've done:
Lovecraft seems to owe a lot to Robert Louis Stevenson and his Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Not that I know that Lovecraft read Stevenson, but I find it difficult to imagine that he would not have considering the similarities between the two authors in their physical conditions (both sickly) and the similarity in style of most of Lovecraft's short stories to Jekyll & Hyde. That style being an unnamed narrator telling a story about a friend suffering the consequences of, usually, some sort of insatiable curiosity. This one, "From Beyond," is closer to Jekyll & Hyde than most.
Back in the early 90s, there was a comic book, Dark Dominion, which dealt with the idea that there was a world of demons that overlapped our own. One man, Michael Alexander, was able to see these demons as they coexisted with us. It was a darkly interesting idea that ended way too soon. I don't know if Jim Shooter, the creator of the series, read Lovecraft, but you can see those same ideas in "From Beyond." I don't know of anyone earlier than Lovecraft writing about these kinds of things in this kind of way. This is not the only of Lovecraft's stories dealing with this idea, but this is the most direct, at least so far. It's short enough that I'm willing to say you should just read it.
About writing. And reading. And being published. Or not published. On working on being published. Tangents into the pop culture world to come. Especially about movies. And comic books. And movies from comic books.
Monday, July 18, 2016
"From Beyond" (a book review post)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I don't think I've read that one. I remember the movie was weird and not quite as good as Re-Animator.
ReplyDeleteAlex: I haven't seen any movies of any of these, but I can't say much about the Reanimator as a written work. Or I can, but none of it's good. That review will be coming up.
DeleteThey really are all similar, aren't they? Not that they're bad reads, though. I haven't read this one, but it sounds pretty interesting. I might read it the next time I have some free time.
ReplyDeleteJeanne: They're not bad reads if you space them out. I can't read more than a couple at a time, because the voice in the stories never changes.
DeleteYeah, I don't know. Lots of times I find the old-timey writing sort of turns me off. Plus most of these don't sound like the kind of thing I'd enjoy too much of, despite liking horror. The "Weird" genre has to be pretty good (Annihilation/The Southern Reach Trilogy good) for me to read it.
ReplyDeleteBriane: I don't think I've read anything else that's part of the Weird genre. Though, all in all, I suppose a case could be made for Tea Kettle being of that genre.
DeleteSeeing the overlapping world: a bit like 6th Sense.
ReplyDeleteI'm really glad to have bread RL Stevenson's biggies recently. I see a lot of stories from the perspective of his influence.
TAS: heh, yeah, I guess it is.
DeleteDespite all of RLS' influence, he is still often dismissed as a hack and inconsequential.
It's good that you space these out and look at them with fresh eyes. I like to do that with books from some fave authors, too, so I have better objectivity.
ReplyDeleteKeep on, keepin' on!
V:)
Veronica: I'm fairly certain that Lovecraft is not going to end up being an author I would put anywhere near "favorite." Maybe "curiosity."
Delete