Monday, March 9, 2015

Assholes (A Theory) (a book review post)

Assholes, by Aaron James, is a difficult book to walk past and not pick up. With a title like that, it's hard to resist. And I'm sure that it's the title that has made the book a New York Times bestseller. Probably bought as gifts, because, when you see a book called Assholes, you're bound to immediately think of someone who ought to have that book no matter what the book is ultimately about. For me, that person was myself. I mean, here was a book that promised to tell me where assholes come from and what to do about them. I didn't even try to resist.

Perhaps, I should have, though. But, ultimately, it's a different experience standing in the book store with the book in your hand than it is looking up the book online and being able to see what other people are saying about it. I probably would have bought the book anyway just to see for myself, but I would have gone into it expecting more of what it was rather than what I hoped it would be.

See, James is a philosophy professor and, as such, the book is presented more as a research paper than as a book. Or, maybe, like a sermon. It very much follows the practice of (1) I am going to tell you what I'm going to talk about. (2) I am going to talk about what I am going to talk about. (3) I am going to tell you what I just talked about. It makes the book annoyingly repetitive at times.

But that's not to say the book isn't without its charms. It does, for instance, give us a workable definition of what an asshole is:
In interpersonal or cooperative relations, the asshole:
  1. allows himself to enjoy special advantages and does so systematically;
  2. does this out of an entrenched sense of entitlement; and
  3. is immunized by his sense of entitlement against the complaints of other people.
I think that's a pretty good definition.

From there, he goes into examples of different types of assholes. The only problem is that he's a bit choosy about the examples and fails to actually provide a general description of the sub-types, leaving it to become "an asshole politician is an asshole who is a politician" or "an asshole driver is an asshole who drives a car." Except he gets even more vague about it by saying things like "sometimes, a person is an asshole only when they are driving [or at work or at home or wherever]," or "sometimes an asshole politician isn't really an asshole himself, he is just taking asshole advice from some other asshole politician [as in the case of Bush from Cheney]." He gets so involved in the philosophy behind assholism that he fails to provide any practical "advice" for identifying assholes definitively.

Also, one of the main purposes of the book is stated to be "asshole management" or how to deal with the assholes in your life. Asshole management boils down to a cost-benefit analysis, because dealing with an asshole is never easy. You therefore have to always weigh the cost of taking a stand against an asshole against the benefit you will get from it. And, then, there is no particular strategy or set of strategies, anyway. He leaves it very "every situation is different," which is true, but, then, don't state that you're going to provide keys to asshole management if you're not actually going to do that.

There are some very interesting portions of the book, like the chapter about asshole capitalism, but I'm not sure I can say that the book is worth reading just for those sections. I also don't think there's any good way to know which sections any given individual ought to read. Personally, the thing I found most interesting about the book was how it came to be in the first place, which had to do with dealing with asshole surfers. Unfortunately, then, the asshole surfer thing serves as no more than a brief illustration about the larger asshole picture.

I suppose, in the end, I would say that the book is worth the read as a curiosity piece. Don't expect to get any actual, practical information out of it beyond the asshole definition, which is something you probably already knew, anyway, but had failed to ever put into words. Mostly, the book serves as a political soapbox from which James can call "asshole" at selected politicians and discuss how assholes caused the financial crisis (and cause most of them). I don't really have a problem with that in a general sense; those guys need more people to point the "asshole finger" at them. However, don't try to disguise that as a guide to identifying and dealing with assholes in regular life if what you really want to do is make a political statement. But, then, James is a philosopher so, maybe, that's all the same to him.

[Also, in posting this review to Amazon, I find it both supremely annoying and amusing that I will have to edit out every usage of the word "asshole" despite the fact that the book is named Assholes.]

26 comments:

  1. I think I can identify one without the help of book. Especially the asshole driving a car.
    That is funny you can't use the book title in your review.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alex: Part of the point of the definition was to differentiate between actual assholes and people who are just having an asshole episode.

      Delete
  2. I definitely don't need help in the identification process, but I sure could use some advice in the management department. That's disappointing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JKIR,F!: Yeah, I was very disappointed in the way the management section was handled.

      Delete
  3. First off, hilarious that you can't even use the book's name in your review. 'Edit-holes' was a nice touch.

    Also, as the others have said, I don't need something to help me identify them. It's a pretty glaring trait in people. Too bad this book couldn't have been more specific. Might have actually made it borderline educational.

    My favorite quote about assholes:
    "If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day long, then you're the asshole." - Raylan Givens, Justified

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ABftS: I love that line! I have used at on many occasions. That's just one of the reasons that Justified has become my favorite TV show ever.

      Delete
  4. I already read your review on Amazon. I think I mentioned you could have written the title as A$$hole.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pat: Yeah, I responded to your comment. That was one thought I had.

      Delete
  5. I would probably buy that book if I saw it in a store. Good thing I don't go in stores.

    Love,
    Janie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Janie: Well, we make one book store trip a year, at Christmas; otherwise, we order our books online.

      Delete
    2. I have a used book store about ten minutes away. I can't go there. I get lost, and I spend too much money.

      Delete
    3. Janie: I think that's the general consensus about ex-husbands.

      Delete
  6. I agree about the entitlement thing helping to shape an asshole. And I do hate when people do that whole "here's what I'm going to talk about" runaround stuff. Just get to the point.

    And, of course, now I have Butthole Surfers on the brain. Ugh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. L.G.: LOL
      I never listened to them. When I first ran across them back in the 80s, I was to aghast to ever give them a chance. As far as I know, I have never heard a single song by them.

      Delete
  7. Yep, that definition looks about right. Of course, the people who really need to read it won't realize that they need to.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jeanne: It wouldn't matter if they did read it, they would think the book was about someone else.

      Delete
  8. I'm not sure why this book exists; it sounds like a blog post that went on too long.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Briane: It's certainly something that went on too long. But it exists because someone saw the title and knew people would buy it.

      Delete
  9. I'm not sure I would pick up a "gag" book anymore, probably because I don't have the kind of people in my life that would appreciate the humor, and probably because after George Takei's "Oh Myyy", I'm a bit more selective with my light reads.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alex H: I don't think this book was intended as a gag book. I'm pretty sure the author was completely serious.

      Delete
  10. Hmm, title seems like the best bit. Don't think I will try this one. Assholes are good incentives for my students to learn accurate punching though, I'll say that for them :-)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Lisa: The title is great; that's for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The definition of an asshole is interesting. My general feeling is that you know one when you meet one. I agree that knowing how to deal with them would be more useful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TAS: He does actually state the thing about knowing one when you meet one, but he wanted a definition to work with, which makes sense to me. That section would have been decent if he hadn't repeated himself so much.

      Delete