The second Avengers movie opens in the middle of a mission. In one sense, it's odd to step into it in the middle of the fighting; however, it serves to show the camaraderie of the group. You can see that they have actually been working together enough to have banter and to have "moves." The way Thor and Cap work together throughout the movie is particularly impressive. Basically, what we have is a fully functioning Avengers team. For about five minutes. Give or take. That's about how long it takes for things to go to Hell.
The movie continues the progression of the Infinity War story, which, since it's been announced as the next movie, I'm not treating as a spoiler, but, more importantly, it sets the stage for the next Captain America movie, which I'm also not treating as a spoiler since it's also been announced.
Beyond that, there's not much I can talk about without spoilers, but I will say this (because it was in the trailers and virtually everyone must have seen pictures by now):
The fight between Iron Man and the Hulk was amazing. Iron Man's Hulk-buster armor is awe inspiring.
Oh, and I really, really hope that this Avengers is also setting up for another solo Hulk movie. Now that we have Mark Ruffalo, it's about time.
Which brings us to the actors. I don't know what there is that can be said about the returnees that hasn't already been said. There's no weak link. Not even Jeremy Renner as Hawkeye, who has emerged as a more central figure in the team dynamic. It's good.
So let's talk about the newcomers:
Aaron Taylor-Johnson as Quicksilver -- He was adequate. It was more that there wasn't enough screen time for him to get a feel for him as a character than it was about the acting. The character in the movie is not the same as the Quicksilver from the comic (who is, more than anything else, haughty), so there was nothing to draw from. I think his signature line really worked for him, though.
Elizabeth Olsen as the Scarlet Witch -- She was suitably spooky in her movements and, although there is a bit more development with her, it still wasn't enough for me to get a handle on her as a character. Again, she doesn't remind me at all of the character from the comics.
Speaking of comparisons to the comics...
I mentioned in one of my earlier Marvel Studios reviews the need to be okay with the divergence of the movie universe from the comic universe. I get that, and I'm okay with it. I don't have a problem with the link to Magneto being removed from the brother/sister duo (though I know that there has been a lot of pissing and moaning about it in some circles). I don't have a problem with the changes to the origins of Ultron and... well, I'll leave him nameless, just in case. The movie universe is not the same. That's fine. The lack of relation to the comics with the case of Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch just leaves me without a comparison to make. They were fine. I just need to see more development before I can form an opinion.
James Spader as the voice of Ultron -- Since his bizarre run in The Office, I've found his new quirkiness fascinating. He used it well as Ultron, playing off of the personality of Tony Stark perfectly. He was great.
Age of Ultron is a great addition to the ongoing Marvel movie story line. In many ways, it is a standalone movie, sort of like an episode of a TV show, something Joss Whedon does well. It has a concise story arc that begins and finishes in this movie, and you don't really need to have seen any of the other Marvel movies to understand what's going on. Having the background makes it a richer, more full experience, but you don't need to have seen them. On the other side of that, you can see the various plot threads the pass through this movie come into it and go back out again (especially the stuff with the Infinity Gems), and that takes more than a small amount of skill to weave those things through without them being a distraction to the main story.
I think I had one small complaint with the movie, but I don't remember what that was, now, so it can't have been that big a deal. It's probably not quite as fun as the first one, but that's about it. I would probably call this a 4.5, but I'll give it the full 5 just for bringing in some of the side characters, especially The Falcon.
About writing. And reading. And being published. Or not published. On working on being published. Tangents into the pop culture world to come. Especially about movies. And comic books. And movies from comic books.
Friday, May 8, 2015
Avengers: Age of Ultron (a movie review post)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That about sums it up! The banter between the characters was priceless. I think it spoke to how much fun the actors were having as well.
ReplyDeleteIt was busy with characters. Just wait until the next one when the Guardians are thrown in.
Alex: "Language!" That was THE BEST.
DeleteIt was somewhat busy with characters. That's the only issue with doing a team thing like this. X-Men has the same problem, except that it has the easy out of revolving everything around Wolverine. There's no simple favorite like that for the Avengers.
Most critics and fanboys seemed underwhelmed by this. We saw it opening day and I thought it was the equal of Avengers 1, if not maybe better. I saw nothing to dislike about it. I agree: 5 stars.
ReplyDeleteBriane: I think it's really because of the changes they had to make because of licensing issues. I cannot believe how many people are tweaked about the lack of ties to Magneto.
DeleteBut, then, my first reaction to Iron Man 3 was kind of the same. I wanted the Mandarin, and I didn't get that. Once I reminded myself, though, that the movie universe is different, I was able to adjust. Most people don't adjust. They just get pissed off about unmet expectations.
Just like with Star Wars.
I really liked it,but was so disappointed in how they treated Black Widow. All that backstory that was teased and mommy whining is all we get. She's killed so many people and turned around looking for redemption, but the thing that haunts her most is forced sterilization? Unfair.
ReplyDeleteJeanne: Well, she's getting her own solo movie, so, maybe, this was just an introduction to things they're going to deal with in that movie.
DeleteIf it's not as fun as the first one then sounds like no fun for me since I didn't care much for the first one. From the previews it looks like just a big ol' super hero circus spectacle and personally I'd rather go to a real circus with clowns, jugglers, and aerial acts.
ReplyDeleteMaybe I'll see it when it comes out on DVD--if I remember.
Arlee Bird
A to Z Challenge Co-host
Tossing It Out
Lee: I'm surprised you saw the first one.
DeleteI'm a sucker for hype and Avengers got a lot of hype. Fool me once and you might fool me again or maybe not.
DeleteArlee Bird
A to Z Challenge Co-host
Tossing It Out
Lee: I'll say this, then:
DeleteNext summer's Captain America movie is one which you will probably appreciate at least for what the conflict will revolve around. Avengers 2 really sets up that conflict. There's a deep moral question involved, and I'm looking forward to next year's movie.
The fact that this movie is getting a thumbs up from you is making me even more excited to go see it. :) Thanks for the spoiler-free version! And yes! I want a new Hulk movie.
ReplyDeleteAlex H: I hope they do one, although there hasn't been any talk of it that I've heard of. Of course, they do have a full slate with what's coming: Black Widow, Dr, Strange, Black Panther.
Delete